Conceptualizing and operationalizing empathetic expressions. In defense of the argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness scales. A study examined the relationship among instructor sociocommunicative style, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom. The authors reported cronbachs alpha on the scales varying from 0. Verbal aggressiveness was chosen as a discriminant validity test.
Verbal aggressiveness and leadership style of sports. The key elements of this concept analysis are summarized in table 2. The purpose of the study was to examine intrinsic motivation of athletes and its relation with instructors verbal aggressiveness and leadership style. Aggression scores also were stable in a 2year followup study. For more information view the sage journals sharing page. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Although the scale is almost always scored as if it were. Thus, the current results do not provide a serious indictment of most previous studies scoring the vas as a 20item unidimensional scale. The second part of the article offers a metaanalysis of scalebehavior and nonbehavioral associations. These findings suggest the need to assess not only overall aggression but also its individual components. The standard verbal aggressiveness scale is composed of 10 negatively worded items e.
A randomized control trial of the effect of yoga on verbal. The instruments employed to answer the research questions were assertivenessresponsiveness measure, verbal aggressiveness scale, and source credibility scale. The goal of this study was to analyze the predictive capacity of aggressiveness physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility and emotional intelligence attention, understanding, and emotional regulation with respect to being a victim, aggressor or victimaggressor of cyberbullying during adolescence. The sourcebook of listening research wiley online books. Essential reading for listening researchers across a range of disciplines, the sourcebook of listening research. Infante and wigleys 1986 verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a widely accepted and frequently used measure of trait verbal aggression. Specifically, the internal consistency and temporal stability of the adolescent argumentativeness scale and the adolescent verbal aggressiveness scale suggest these instruments are reliable when used to assess these predispositions in adolescent populations. Methodology and measures is a landmark publication that defines the field of listening research and its best practices. Verbally aggressive messages attack an individuals selfconcept to inflict psychological pain. Infante and wigley developed a trait measure of verbal aggressiveness.
Using the 5 point scale shown below, indicate how uncharacteristic or characteristic each of the following statements is in describing you. The list represents all measures for which documentation was available and may not be exhaustive. The list represents all measures for which documentation was available and may not be. Exploration of determinants of verbal aggressiveness and. For each of the following 29 statements, rate how characteristic this is of you. One such measure is the 12item brief aggression questionnaire baq. In general, aggression, conflict and violence sometimes occur, but direct confrontation is generally avoided and conflict is socially managed by a variety of verbal and non verbal methods.
First, verbal aggressiveness creates a defensive learning environment, causes psychological pain, and distracts students from focusing on all sides of an issue. Table means for the aggression questionnaire males n 612 males females n 641 females physical aggression i 24. The scale has been widely used in communication research. Verbal aggressiveness is the predisposition to attack the selfperception of others. The research has been based on a personality trait model that was used to conceptualize a very basic ideathat some aggressive behaviors are constructive and others are destructive. Like a wild, rabid animal, verbally aggressive people come toward you on the attack, often with little or no reason. Start studying interpersonal communications chapter 11. Author farber, eugene w burgecallaway, katherine g. At first glance, you may think that these findings are. I try very hard to avoid having other people feel bad about themselves when i try to influence them.
Trait aggressiveness is often measured with a selfreport assessment, such as the bussperry. The baseline score of the two groups did not differ significantly p 0. Expression of anger scale ea, the verbal aggressiveness scale ve, the physical aggressiveness scale ph, the passive aggressiveness scale pa, and the selfconfidence scale sc. The verbal aggressiveness scale this survey is concerned with how we try to get people to comply with our wishes. This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the verbal aggressiveness article. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes. Article information, pdf download for verbal aggressiveness. Physical, verbal, anger and hostility aggressiveness in universitys physical education students international journal of sports and physical education ijspe page 22 multiple comparisons dependent variable i aggression j aggression mean difference ij sig. Avtgis include a collection of nine widely used reliable and. The buss perry aggressiveness questionnaire was used for the data collection. To better understand verbal aggressiveness among physicians and trainees, including specialtyspecific differences. Scale scores correlated with peer nominations of the various kinds of aggression. Speculations are advanced as to why high verbal aggressives are prone to using self.
Mean scores on the aggression scale were associated positively with teachers independent rating of student aggression, other measures of aggression, and known predictors of aggression. The questionnaire is a selfreport scale consisting of 29 items answered on a 5point likert type scale. Infante and wigleys scale is often scored as unidimensional. Despite this there is no consistent use of rating scales for assessing aggressive behaviour in this population. The dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale. When individuals are very stubborn, i use insults to soften the stubbornness. Verbal aggressiveness scale vas request pdf researchgate. The construct validity and factor structures of the argumentativeness scale arg. A rationale is developed for studying verbal aggression apart from other types of aggression, and several studies developing a verbal aggressiveness scale are reported. This is not a forum for general discussion of the articles subject. Argumentative and aggressive communication in relational and.
A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. Although the scale is almost always scored as if it were unidimensional, previous factor analytic studies provide evidence that it is multidimensional with two distinct factors. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The aggression scale a selfreport measure of aggressive. In some cases, the men in verbally abusive relationships retreat or withdraw from their partner, only to discover it heightens the anger. Verbal aggressiveness is an assault on anothers self concept, rather than hisher position. Place your rating in the box to the right of the statement. Design and participants the infante verbal aggressiveness scale ivas was administered as part of a survey to 48 medical students, 24 residents, and 257 attending physicians. However, factor analytic studies have offered evidence that the scale is multidimensional. First, the study evaluates the reliability of selfreports of argumentativeness by comparing selfreported argumentativeness with two other reports of the same target. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63, 452459. The aggression scale consists of 4 factors, physical aggression pa, verbal aggression va, anger a and hostility h.
Request pdf verbal aggressiveness scale vas the verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a 20item selfreport measure of the personality trait of verbal. Second, the study examines whether particular characteristics e. The prca was chosen because the mtercuitural and mterethnic contexts were expected tocorre1ate with the four contexts represented m the prca. Compassionate touch was positively correlated with compassion, empathetic concern, perspective taking, emotional intelligence, social expressivity, emotional expressivity, and benevolence, and uncorrelated with verbal aggressiveness and benevolence.
Because verbal aggression is so widespread, because it tends to be destructively reciprocal and escalative,14 because it is a real and unfortunately alltocommon event in human communication in mediation as well as in everyday life, and because it poses a serious threat to effective communication and cooperation and hence to the success. Verbal aggressiveness is viewed as a skill deficiency whereby an individual lacks the verbal skills required to deal with normal disagreements and everyday frustrations. Type aggression psychology in the youtube search box and notice many interesting documentaries about psychological discoveries about human aggression, such as this one. Questionnaire of aggressiveness in sport and business. These behaviours include yelling, hitting, swearing and verbal abuse. The studies delve into the trait and state antecedents to aggressive language use as well as its interpersonal consequences. Personality and the moderating effect of mood on a verbal. Finds that the twofactor solution of the argumentativeness scale and the verbal aggressiveness scale was a reasonable overall fit to samples of both u. Use this score to track changes in level of aggression over time. This paper outlines a conceptual analysis of aggression. Argumentative and aggressive communication in relational.
Although prior work suggests the baqs scores are reliable and valid, we. They consist of attributes, antecedents, empirical referents, and consequences. Avoiding verbally aggressive behavior in the classroom is important for three primary reasons. The results are discussed in terms of understanding the nature of trait verbal aggressiveness. The results indicated that the more people are seen as verbally aggressive, the less liked they are. Argumentativeness is a predisposition to recognize issues and advocate strongly for a position. Wvdotdoh page 8 argumentativeness scale the argumentativeness scale is designed to measure the degree to which an individual presents and defends positions on controversial issues while simultaneously attacking the positions which other people take on issues. The articles contained in this special issue focus on verbal aggression. In scoring summary, multiply sum by weight and add weighted sums for total weighted score. Summary the verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a 20.
Pdf the dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness. The following table contains information and references for self and teacher report measures of aggressive behavior and victimization in youth. Physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility. Communication behavior is considered verbally aggressive when an individual applies symbolic force to dominate, damage, defeat, or destroy another persons self. The concept of aggression is important to nursing because further knowledge of aggression can help generate a better theoretical model to drive more effective intervention and prevention approaches. Verbal abuse in the form of yelling, screaming, and swearing is common and can lead to harm because it is designed to humiliate, degrade, and intimidate a partner or family member. The scale is brief, is easy to administer, and focuses on overt behaviors.
Implications are discussed, especially in terms of understanding and controlling physical aggression. I am extremely careful to avoid attacking individuals intelligence when i attack their ideas. In this article we present the analysis of the reliability and validity of the aggressiveness in sport and business questionnaire which was. Results indicate that the scale is valid and reliable. In this case, we used the verbal aggressiveness scale with a cronbachs alpha of 0. The results show that research testing scalebehavior convergence is sparse and that the little research that currently exists is inconsistent with convergent and predictive validity. Arguing constructively participant guide wvdotdoh page 2 table of contents. Verbal aggressiveness was assessed before and after eight weeks using the selfadministered verbal aggressive scale. And there is never any excuse for it no matter how frustrated you are and no matter how badly abused you have been by the person youre giving it back to. Types of talk, verbal aggressiveness, communication climate 2 abstract significant research has investigated jack gibbs model of defensive and supportive communication, but little has explored the influence of the type of talk defensive or supportive on perceptions of communication climate and the role that verbal. Theory, research, and application is the first text to describe the development, history, research, and application efforts on the communication traits of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness. Pdf infante and wigleys 1986 verbal aggressiveness scale vas is a widely accepted and frequently used measure of trait verbal aggression find, read. Indicate how often each statement is true for you personally when you try to influence other persons. Pdf verbal aggressiveness hample, 2008 dale hample.
Physical, verbal, anger and hostility aggressiveness in. Participant guide west virginia department of transportation. Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and. The bussperry aggression questionnaire bpaq is a popular measure of aggression in adults.
A study of 181 college students is reported which explored the types of verbally aggressive messages used, the types of messages received, perceptions of the hurt produced by the messages, and the reasons for using verbal aggression which differentiate high from low verbal aggressives. Individuals who rely on verbal aggressiveness are viewed as less credible, have less satisfying relationships, and resort to physical aggression more often. Theres no other label to pin on it but verbal abuse. Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness as predictors of partnerperceptions of conflict styles during a simulated downsizing activity an extensive body of research has examined how the traits of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness function within organizations e. Infante and charles j w wigley iii, published on 010107. Trait verbal aggressiveness is defined as the predisposition to attack the self. Pages 245268 received 30 nov 2001, accepted 20 jun 2004, published online. Verbal aggressiveness scale vas the sourcebook of listening. This concept is similar to that of tolerance for disagreement. Psycinfo earliest to 2004, and medline 1950 to 2004. Verbal aggressiveness continued verbal aggressiveness is an assault on anothers self concept, rather than hisher position. This prologue tracks trends in research on verbal aggression and related concepts over the past 60 years.
Pdf the dimensionality of the verbal aggressiveness scale. Insights to argumentativeness in relation to leadership. Verbal aggressiveness among physicians and trainees. The measurement of aggressive communication predispositions. Whenever possible, we provide the range of internal consistency for the measures. The vas has 20 items, 10 that are 10worded negativelyaggressively, and 10 worded positivelykindly. The results identified types of messages used, beliefs about hurt and reasons for use which distinguish high from low verbal aggressives. Interpersonal communications chapter 11 flashcards quizlet. An interpersonal model is developed that specifies the types of verbally aggressive messages in interpersonal relations, their effects, and their causes. Cyberbullying, aggressiveness, and emotional intelligence. There was a significant decrease in verbal aggressiveness in the yoga group p 0. A good deal of research on argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness has been conducted in the communication discipline in this and the previous decade. Men show a higher level of aggression than women archer, 2004. Different rates of aggression or violence, currently or in the past, within or between groups, have been linked to the structuring of societies and.
Implementing the rating scale for aggressive behaviours in. Instructor sociocommunicative style, argumentativeness. At first glance, you may think that these findings are intuitive. The total score for aggression is the sum of the factor scores. Participants were 9 undergraduate students enrolled at a small southern university who completed the assertivenessresponsiveness.
168 174 767 759 1332 455 1366 1270 611 1378 512 468 832 1185 252 903 1475 469 624 599 872 367 579 885 163 368 110 301 1300 1130 207 807 233 1449 647